Sikandar Ibrahim Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Dixit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3040 OF 2017 Sikandar Ibrahim Shaikh ....

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai & Anr.

....

Respondents Mr. B.R. Patil, i/by Mr. Santosh S. Musale, for the Petitioner. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.

DATE : 7TH AUGUST, 2017.

P.C. :

.

Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board. 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Respondent-State.

3.

The Petitioner was granted parole. Pursuant thereto, he was released from prison on 21st June 2017 for a period of 45 days. Thereafter, the Petitioner preferred an application for extension of parole before the concerned authority. The Petitioner is now seeking extension of parole for a further period of 15 days.

1/2 WP-3040-17.doc

4.

The application of the Petitioner for extension of parole is pending before the concerned authority. Hence, it is not possible for this Court to interfere in the said matter. The only order which can be passed by this Court is that the concerned authorities shall dispose of the said application of the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible. 5.

Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2/2 WP-3040-17.doc