Raghoji Dattaram Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra

Dixit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3047 OF 2017 Raghoji Dattaram Shinde (Through Jail) ....

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ....

Respondent Ms. Rohini M. Dandekar, Appointed Advocate, for the Petitioner. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.

DATE : 23RD AUGUST, 2017.

ORAL JUDGMENT : [Per Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.] 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

The Petitioner preferred an application for furlough on 14th January 2017. The grievance of the Petitioner is that, as the Police Report was not received, his application for furlough was not decided. Being aggrieved by the fact that his application for furlough was not decided, the Petitioner has preferred the present Petition. 3.

The learned A.P.P., on instructions, made a statement that the application of the Petitioner for furlough has been granted by order 1/2 WP-3047-17.doc

dated 18th August 2017. In view of this statement, this Petition has become infructuous. Hence, Rule is discharged. [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2/2 WP-3047-17.doc