Rajesh Vinayak Ghaisas v. Datta Patil Urban Co. Op. Credit Society Ltd. And ANR

hcs 1 8.revn467.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.467 OF 2016 Rajesh Vinayak Ghaisas .. Applicant.

Vs.

Datta Patil Urban Co-op.

Credit Society Ltd.

.. Respondents.

Mr.Rohit Pande for the Applicant.

Mr.Rahul M. More for Respondent No.1.

Mr. S.V. Gavand APP for the State.

CORAM : A. K. MENON, J.

DATED : 19TH JUNE, 2017 P.C. :

1.

The consent terms have been arrived at by the parties. The applicant had taken a loan from the respondent no.1 - society. It appears that the parties have settled the dispute and respondent no.1 has agreed to accept sum of Rs.3,55,000/- in full and final settlement. Accordingly, the parties have tendered the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. In the circumstances offence being compoundable and the parties have arrived at settlement, the same is compounded. The impugned orders dated 30th July, 2012 and 6th August, 2016 are hereby quashed and set aside. Revision application is disposed of in the above terms. (A.K. MENON, J.)