Satish Gajanan Mulik v. Pune Municipal Corporation, Through Its Commissioner And ORS

1/2 17wp8382.18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8382 of 2018 Satish Gajanan Mulik ...

Petitioner V/s.

Pune Municipal Corporation & ors.

...

Respondents Mr.S.M.Gorwadkar, Sr. Counsel i/b. Niranjan A. Mogre for the petitioner.

Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for the State.

Mr.A.P.Kulkarni for the Corporation.

CORAM :

NARESH H. PATIL, ACTING C.J.

& R.G. KETKAR, J.

10th September, 2018.

P.C.

The learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that application seeking permission to hold handicraft exhibition was filed with Corporation in the month of May. The said application is pending consideration. The learned Counsel submits that prayer

2/2 17wp8382.18.doc clause (b) is not pressed.

2.

The learned Counsel appearing for Corporation seeks two weeks time. The authority would decide the said application and communicate the decision to the petitioner.

3.

With aforesaid observation, Writ Petition stands disposed of. R.G. KETKAR, J ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE L.S. Panjwani, P.S.

by Lata Sunil Panjwani Date:

2018.09.14 13:23:37 +0530 Lata Sunil Panjwani