Satish Krishnaji Patil And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

P.H. Jayani 53 APL814.2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 814 OF 2017 Avinash Madhukar Kharat .... Applicant v/s.

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 815 OF 2017 Satish Krishnaji Patil and anr.

.... Applicants v/s.

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 904 OF 2017 Uday Baburao Fasale and ors.

.... Applicants v/s.

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 914 OF 2017 Shashikant Shamrao Patil and ors.

.... Applicants v/s.

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1160 OF 2017 Ashok Ramchandra Patil and anr.

.... Applicants v/s.

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Ms. Stefy Dias a/w. Mr. Umesh Mankapure for the Applicants in all Applications.

Dr. Dhanalakshmi S. Krishnaiyer, APP for the State. 1/2

P.H. Jayani 53 APL814.2017.doc CORAM: A.S. GADKARI AND SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

DATED : 22nd APRIL, 2024.

P. C. :- 1) Learned counsel for the Applicants submitted that, the Advocate on record for the Applicants by his Notice dated 09th January, 2024 has informed his intention to seek discharge from the case as he has already returned the papers with no objection in favour of the Applicants. 2) Today, neither any of the Applicants nor any other Advocate representing them is present, when called out. It appears that, the Applicants are not interested in pursuing the Applications.

3) Applications are dismissed for want of prosecution. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) PREETI HEERO JAYANI PREETI HEERO JAYANI Date: 2024.04.30 17:46:48 +0530 2/2