Mr. Vitthal Gangaram Chintakindi v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Principal Secretary , Urban Dev. Dept. Mantralaya And ANR

916-WP.11118.2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11118 OF 2018 Mr.Vitthal Gangaram Chintakindi } Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra } and Ors.

} Respondents Dr.Ramdas P. Sabban for the petitioner.

Mr.S.B.Talekar I/b. M/s. Talekar and Associates for respondent no.2.

Ms. Kirti Kulkarni-AGP for State.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATE :- MARCH 19, 2019 P.C. :- 1.

After hearing both sides and since the petitioner says that he has lost the portion of the property where a development plan road (DP Road) and 18 meters in width had been constructed, he would now want compensation for the deprivation of his right, title and interest in the immovable property. He says that he has annexed to this petition all the documents which would enable the Municipal Corporation to process his claim for compensation. 2.

After this writ petition was heard for some time, we direct that the Pune Municipal Corporation shall proceed to consider J.V.Salunke,P.S.

916-WP.11118.2018.doc this petition as a request of the petitioner and additionally, the petitioner will provide the documents at Sr. Nos. 8, 9 and 13 at page 69 of the paper book. On such documents being provided, the claim for compensation be processed and a decision be taken in accordance with law.

3.

With this direction, the writ petition is disposed of, but we direct that the decision shall be taken within a period of four weeks from the date of furnishing these documents. (B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,P.S.