Najama Khatun Ismile Sayyad v. The State Of Maharashtra

7.BA1576_2015.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Vidya Amin BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1576 OF 2015 Najama Khatun Ismile Sayyad ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent None for the applicant.

Mrs. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.

Mr. Rasam, P.S.I., Goregaon Police Station present. CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE: 20th April, 2016.

P.C.:

When the matter is called out, none present for the applicant. Learned APP, on instructions, submitted that the evidence of prosecutrix and complainant-father are recorded. The trial before the Sessions Court is in progress. Now the matter is fixed on 28th April, 2016 for further evidence.

2.

In view of this submission and as the learned counsel for the applicant/accused is not present, the Bail Application is dismissed for default with the following direction:

"The Trial Court to expedite the matter on or before 30th June, 2016."

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 1 / 1