Mahendra Dagushet Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 4 APL 818 -17.doc Sequeira

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 818 OF 2017 Mahendra Dagushet Pawar ...

Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra and another ... Respondents Mr.Shivshankar D.Patil, for the Applicant.

Ms.S.D.Shinde, APP, for Respondent-State.

Ms.Tanaya D.Goswami, for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

Date : 7 December, 2018.

P.C. :

Contention is that cognizance is being taken after expiry of period of limitation.

2.

We have perused FIR. We are not inclined to intervene in extra ordinary jurisdiction. Respondent No.2 Complainant, has on 6 December 2013 while lodging FIR given necessary facts and offence is under Section 354(A) and Section 166 of Indian Penal Code. Hence with liberty to the Applicant to take necessary steps before the trial Court and keeping all contentions of parties open, we dispose of present proceedings.

(Sarang V. Kotwal, J.) (B.P.Dharmadhikari, J.)