Radhanath Mrigendra Nath Modak v. The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Bombay And ANR.

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. NO. 14318 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1212 OF 2022 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's order appearance, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adv. Shubham Paygude i/by Adv. P. B. Gujar present for Applicant CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 18/08/2023 Perused.

As per office note, notice issued to Respondent No. 2 is returned unserved with Bailiff's remark dated 06/01/2023, "Not found, after inquiry do not know anything about Respondent No. 2. Hence Notice along with copy of application affixed on given addresses".

The learned Advocate for Applicant is not aware about new address. Thus, only option left is to serve the Respondent No. 2 by way of substituted service.

The Learned Advocate has taken out present Interim Application to serve Respondent No. 2 by way of substituted service. Address of Respondent No. 2 mentioned in the above notice is same as mentioned in Interim Application and in memo of First Appeal as well as in Judgment of the Lower Court.

In turn, Interim Application No.

14318 of 2023 (for substituted service) is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), returnable by 08 weeks.

Sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)