Dayaram Sarju Yadav v. Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority And ANR

50 ao 865-14=.doc FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 865 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1040 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Ajinkya Palav i/b P. J. Thorat for the appellant/applicant.

Mr. Vinod Mahadik for the respondent/BMC.

Mr. R. S. Patil for respondent no. 1.

CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATED : 02/02/2015.

P.C.:

.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

Advocate Mr. Palav for the appellant submits that the respondent corporation already demolished the suit structure. Hence, nothing survives in the present Appeal from Order.

Appeal from Order is dismissed as infructuous in view of subsequent development. No order as to costs.

In view of dismissal of Appeal from Order, nothing survives in Civil Application. Hence, Civil Application is also dismissed as infructuous. (K.K.TATED, J.) Sneha Chavan 1/1