Pyarelal Ramsurat Yadav v. The State Of Maharashtra

(26)ABA-2208-2022.doc rajshree

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2208 OF 2022 Pyarelal Ramsurat Yadav ] ..

Applicant vs.

State of Maharashtra ] ..

Respondent None for the Applicant.

Smt.Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.

CORAM :

BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE :

26th SEPTEMBER, 2022.

P.C.

1] The learned APP states that the Applicant has reported to the Investigating Officer, but the Investigating Officer is desirous of obtaining his voice sample.

2] While admitting the Applicant to the interim protection, on the basis of accusations levelled against him, prima-facie conclusion was recorded that since accusations levelled against the Applicant falls short of offence under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, based on the latest position of law enunciated by the Apex Court in the case of Arnab Goswami vs. State of Maharashtra, let the Applicant report to the Investigating Officer since his voice sample is sought for and render all his co-operation in completing the investigation. 1/2

(26)ABA-2208-2022.doc 3] Order dated 17.08.2022 is made absolute subject to condition Nos.(b) and (c).

4] In the wake of above, Application is disposed off. [BHARATI DANGRE, J] 2/2