Kailashchandra Tarachand Maheshwari And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 869 OF 2014 Kailash T. Maheshwari and Another.

..Applicants.

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Another.

..Respondents.

Mr. Dinesh Kumar A. Dubhey for the Applicants. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, learned APP for the State.

Mr. Amil Doijode for Respondent No. 2.

Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

Date : June 24, 2015.

P. C. :

1.

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties. Perused the FIR. It prima facie discloses the commission of cognizable offence.

2.

It is not disputed that during the pendency of this application, the investigation is completed and charge-sheet has already been filed. The Applicants have an alternate and efficacious remedy of seeking discharge before the trial Court. In these circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain this application and the same is accordingly dismissed. [SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] patilsr 1 / 1