Smt. Rukmini Sadashiv Mali v. Mr. Raghunath Ganpati Mali And ORS.

04-CAF-4273-2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4273 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 14756 OF 2016 Rukmini Sadashiv Mali ...

Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Rukmini Sadashiv Mali ...

Appellant

Versus

Raghunath Ganpati Mali and Ors.

...

Respondents .....

Mr. Prashant P. Kulkarni, for the Applicant.

Mr. Kush M. Lohankar i/b Mr. S. R. Ganbavale, for the Respondent No.1.

.....

CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.

DATED : 13th MARCH, 2023.

P.C.

1.

Heard.

2.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that a delay of 10 days has occurred due to the old age and several ailments of the applicant, who could not deliver the entire papers of the matter to the Advocate.

REKHA PRAKASH PATIL by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2023.03.14 18:50:04 +0530 Rekha Patil

04-CAF-4273-2016.doc 3.

Learned Counsel for respondent No.1 has no objection. 4.

As such, the Application is allowed. Delay of 10 days stands condoned.

5.

Application stands disposed of.

6.

Registry is directed to number the Appeal.

[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] Rekha Patil