← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3122/2017other disposed off

Ahmad Hussain Mangaru Siddique And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2018-02-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.2 pages

* 1/2 * 55-WP-3122-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3122 OF 2017 Mr. Ahmad Hussain Mangaru Siddique & Ors.

....Petitioners V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents Mr. F.N.Momin with Mr. Gautam J. Jain i/by Mr. Shaikh Abdul Vasid, , Advocates for Petitioners.

Mrs. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Rohan P. Surve, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ****** CORAM :- R.M.SAVANT & CORAM :- R.M.SAVANT & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :- DATE :- 20TH FEBRUARY, 2018.

20TH FEBRUARY, 2018.

P.C. :- P.C. :- The learned APP Mrs. Malhotra on instructions of the The learned APP Mrs. Malhotra on instructions of the Investigating Officer Mr. Ramesh Yadav attached to Nizampura Investigating Officer Mr. Ramesh Yadav attached to Nizampura Police Station, Bhiwandi states that Section 307 of the Indian Penal Police Station, Bhiwandi states that Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 would be dropped from the offences alleged against the Code, 1860 would be dropped from the offences alleged against the Petitioners. The learned APP further states that on completion of Petitioners. The learned APP further states that on completion of investigation, appropriate report would be filed in the concerned investigation, appropriate report would be filed in the concerned Court.

Court.

In view thereof, it is not necessary to keep the above In view thereof, it is not necessary to keep the above Petition pending. It would be contingent upon the report that would Petition pending. It would be contingent upon the report that would Shivgan

* 2/2 * 55-WP-3122-2017.doc be filed by the Investigating Agency that further course of action be filed by the Investigating Agency that further course of action would be open to the Petitioners as well as the Respondent No.2. would be open to the Petitioners as well as the Respondent No.2. The Petition is accordingly disposed of.

The Petition is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (R.M.SAVANT, J.) Shivgan