Kaushal Kumar Parmar v. Pushpa Prakash Gadiya And ORS.

ANANT KRISHNA NAIK by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2024.02.16 13:36:56 +0530 1/1 22.CAS.37.2021_.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application in SA NO. 37 OF 2021 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 20554 OF 2019 Kaushal Kumar Parmar ...Applicant.

Versus

Pushpa Prakash Gadiya & Ors.

...Respondents

Adv. Suryajeet Chavan a/w. Adv. Vishaka Shelar for the Applicant. None for the Respondents.

CORAM : M. M. SATHAYE, J.

DATED :

14th FEBRUARY, 2024 P.C.:

1.

This is an Application for condonation of delay of 107 days in filing the above Second Appeal. Office note shows that all the Respondents are served. The Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 are represented through lawyer, whose name appears on the board. None appeared for the Respondents. No Reply is filed opposing the Application.

2.

In view thereof, considering the extent of delay and uncontroverted averments in the Application, sufficient cause is made out. The Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Delay is condoned. (M. M. SATHAYE, J.) akn 1/1