Uday Suresh Surve v. The State Of Maharashtra

Digitally signed by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date:

2021.08.09 12:39:13 +0530 RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1065 OF 2015 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 727 OF 2015 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1065 OF 2015 Harsha Rohidas Kukar and Ors.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 722 OF 2015 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015 Alpesh Dhirendra Batavia (HUF) Karta and Anr.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 644 OF 2015 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015 Aditya Sehgal (Intervener) 1/4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 650 OF 2015 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015 Lalitt B. Rohira (Intervenor) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 795 OF 2015 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015 Dilip Kishanchand Dadlani CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 841 OF 2015 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015 Sunil B. Sangvekar ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1066 OF 2015 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 832 OF 2015 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1066 OF 2015 Sanjay Kunjilal Agrawal 2/4

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1226 OF 2015 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 833 OF 2015 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1226 OF 2015 Vipul Suresh Mehta Mr. Chaitanya Kotnis i/b Kulkarni and Associates for the Applicant. Ms. P.P.Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 7 th AUGUST, 2021 P.C. :

1.

Learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, states that the Applicant was arrested in all the C.Rs. i.e. C.R.Nos. 442 of 2015, 634 of 2015 and 403 of 2015, initially registered with the D.N.Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, and C.R.No.369 of 2015 registered with the MHB Police 3/4

Station, Borivali (W) and subsequently, transferred to the E.O.W., Mumbai. He submits that after the Applicant was arrested in the said C.Rs., he was released on regular bail and that, chargesheet has been filed in all the aforesaid C.Rs.

2.

Learned APP does not dispute the aforesaid.

3.

Considering the aforesaid, the applications are rendered infructuous. The same are accordingly disposed of as infructuous. 4.

In view of the disposal of the aforesaid applications, none of the Interim Applications survive for consideration. All the Interim Applications are also accordingly disposed of. 5.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

4/4