Smt. Laxmibai Baloor v. Canara Bank

Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 12275 OF 1995 AGAINST WRIT PETITION NO. 4586 OF 1994 Sitaben Sanjay Parker & ors.

Jivan Bhai Waghela

...Respondent

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 21980 OF 1996 Wai Taluka Kharedi Vikri Sangh Wai Bajirao M. Mahadik

...Respondent

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 22925 OF 1996 Jaykrishna K. Sharma The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 23231 OF 1996 CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 23232 OF 1996 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 23231 OF 1996 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 23232 OF 1996 Mrs. F. Saran Mrs. G. M. Engineer & anr.

...Respondents

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 23548 OF 1996 --------- ---------

...Respondents

1/6

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 23987 OF 1996 D. G. Bhavsar Indian Education Society Dadar

...Respondent

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 2066 OF 1997 Tata Engineering & Locomative Ltd.

The Presiding Officer, II Labour Court, Pune

...Respondent

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 9366 OF 1997 AGAINST WRIT PETITION NO.1032 OF 1995 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5457 OF 1997 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 9366 OF 1997 M/s. Sanghvi Metal Corporation Engineering & General Wrokers Trade Union & anr.

...Respondents

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 27082 OF 1997 AGAINST CP NO. 48 OF 1996 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6300 OF 1997 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6588 OF 1997 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 27082 OF 1997 M/s. Warden & Co. (India) Ltd. & anr.

Akhil Maharashtra Kamgar Union

...Respondent

2/6

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 5820 OF 1998 CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 5821 OF 1998 Smt. Laxmibai Baloor Canara Bank

...Respondent

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 28350 OF 1998 CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 28351 OF 1998 Vinod V. Dharod Sahadeo Babu Damale & ors.

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 41973 OF 1998 CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 41975 OF 1998 Worli Siddhivinayak Co.op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. & anr.

Parmanand K. Mhatra & ors.

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 19266 OF 1999 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 610 OF 2000 Pratapgonda Peergonda Patil Shivgonda @ Babusaheb P. Patil (deceased) & ors.

3/6

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 20303 OF 1999 CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 20306 OF 1999 Union of India & ors.

Karala S. Reddy

...Respondent

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 21501 OF 2004 AGAINST WRIT PETITION NO. 2170 OF 1995 CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 106 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 107 OF 2005 Adm. Officer, Municipal Primary Education & anr.

Chandrakant Hanmantrao Nargunde & ors.

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 21506 OF 2004 AGAINST WRIT PETITION NO.2165 OF 1995 CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 103 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 118 OF 2005 Adm. Officer, Municipal Primary Education & anr.

Manohar Kisan Bhosale & ors.

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 5606 OF 2006 AGAINST WRIT PETITION NO. 9017 OF 2004 Vaishali Bhalchandra Bhoite University of Pune & ors.

4/6

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 10303 OF 2006 AGAINST WRIT PETITION NO. 7805 OF 2005 Malasi Thavar Rita The Thane Janata Sah. Bank Ltd. & ors.

Ms. Priya Patil, I/b S. G. Deshmukh, for the Appellant in LPA(ST) No.21980/1996.

Mr. Ajinkya Udane, for the Petitioner in LPA(ST) No.21506 of 2004.

Mr. Shubham Misar, for the Appellant in LPA(ST) No.5606 of 2006.

Mr. Ketan Dhavle, for the Appellant in LPA(ST) No.19266 of 1999.

Ms. Tanvi Kamt Deosthale, I/b Mandar Limaye, for Respondent no.1 in LPA(ST) No.21506 of 2004.

Mr. Yatin Malvankar, for the Respondent in LPA(ST) No.21501 of 2004.

CORAM:

R. M. BORDE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATED:

11th JUNE, 2019 PC:- 1.

It appears that the Notice, in terms of the order passed earlier on 4th December, 2018, was published on the official website of this court on 14th December, 2018. On 22nd April, 2019, this court directed the parties and the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties to take steps for reconstitution of the paper-book of the appeals within a period of one month from the date of the order dated 22nd April, 2019. However, till today no steps have been taken. 5/6

2.

In the circumstances, there is no alternative except to dispose of the Appeals on account of non-prosecution and the appeals are accordingly disposed of.

3.

In view of disposal of the appeals, the civil applications do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] [R. M. BORDE, J.] 6/6