Shri. Vithoba Devasthan Trust And ORS v. Mr. Uday Rajnikant Joshi And ANR.

7-wp-3421-19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3421 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 319 OF 2020 Shree Vithoba Devasthan Trust Through its Trustees ..Petitioners

Versus

Mr. Uday Rajnikant Joshi & Anr.

..Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2623 OF 2022 Mr. Uday Rajnikant Joshi ..Applicant.

In the matter between Shree Vithoba Devasthan Trust Through its Trustees ..Petitioners

Versus

Mr. Uday Rajnikant Joshi & Anr.

..Respondents __________ Mr. Drupad S. Patil for Petitioners.

Mr. Gaurav Nankar i/b. Ojas Deolankar for Respondent No.1. Mr. Shashank P. Borade for Respondent No.2.

__________ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 28 MARCH 2023 PC :

1.

Heard Shri. Drupad Patil, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Shri. Gaurav Nankar, learned counsel for the Digitally signed by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date:

2023.03.29 14:10:21 +0530 VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Gokhale

7-wp-3421-19 Respondent No.1 and Shri. Shashank Borade, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for all the parties have tendered the consent terms. It is taken on record and marked ' X'

for identification. In view of these consent terms, the Petitioners do not press this petition and seeks withdrawal of this petition. 3.

Permission is granted. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn in view of the consent terms filed by the parties. 4.

The parties are present in the Court; they are identified by their respective counsel. The undertaking mentioned in the consent terms be treated as undertaking by the parties to the Court.

5.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

6.

All the pending applications in this Petition are also disposed of.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)