B. Basha And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

(6)APPANo.12352018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1235 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.917 OF 2018 Mr.B.Basha & Ors.

...

Applicants V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...

Respondents .....

Mr.Ashok Mundargi, Senior Counsel with Mr.Karan Rajput Counsel with Mr.Sanjay Udeshi Advocate with Mr.Akshay Udeshi, Advocate i/b.M/s.Sanjay Udeshi & Co, Advocate for the Applicants.

Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent/State.

....

CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.

DATED : 27th AUGUST 2018.

P.C. :

None for the respondent No.2 despite service. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicants/original accused as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

Though the learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the application for condonation of 79 days delay in preferring the appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes Gaikwad RD 1/2

(6)APPANo.12352018 and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, pleading in the application, which are on affirmation, reflected sufficient cause. Hence, the Order :

ORDER

(i) The application is allowed.

(ii) The delay in filing the application is condoned. (iii) The application is disposed of accordingly.

(A.M.BADAR J.) Raju Dattatraya Gaikwad Raju Dattatraya Gaikwad Date: 2018.08.27 18:01:30 +0530 Gaikwad RD 2/2