Chetandas Ganjanmal Ubhrani And ANR v. Sadashiv Punjaji Jadhav And ORS

1 CAW 2275-12 in WP 5095-11.doc-11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2275 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5095 OF 2011 Chetandas Ganjanmal Ubhrani and Anr.

] ... Applicants/ Petitioners

Versus

Sadashiv Punaji Jadhav and Ors.

] ... Respondents Mr. Mahesh Rawool i/b P. B. Shah for Applicants. Mr. Sachin Gite for Respondent No.1.

CORAM :- M. S. SONAK, J.

DATE :- APRIL 06, 2015 P. C. :- 1.

The learned Counsel for Applicants states that Respondents have been served.

2.

In view of the same, although the delay involved is substantial, considering that there is no opposition and looking to the reasons set out in the Civil Application, the same is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c).

3.

Necessary amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.

URS

2 CAW 2275-12 in WP 5095-11.doc-11 4.

Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (M. S. SONAK, J.) URS