← Library
Bombay High CourtSA/953/2012compromisedconsent terms

Sachin Baban Korake v. Sou. Bhamabai Pandurang Kadam

2016-09-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka2 pages

kvm 1/2 pro1-SA953.12

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 953 OF 2012 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1922 OF 2012 Sachin Baban Korake ..... Appellant

VERSUS

Sou.Bhamabai Pandurang Kadam ..... Respondent Mr.Ajay Joshi for the Appellant.

Mr.Machindra Patil for the Respondent No.1.

No records and proceedings.

CORAM :

R.D. DHANUKA, J.

DATE :

19th SEPTEMBER, 2016 P.C.

Papers are allowed to be produced at 03.00 p.m. 2.

By consent of parties, conditional order dated 13th December, 2013 passed by this court in Second Appeal No.953 of 2012 is recalled. Second Appeal is restored to file.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the parties have tendered a consent minutes of the order signed by the appellant. The respondent has put her left hand thumb impression on the consent terms. The signature of the appellant is identified by the learned advocate for the appellant. The left hand thumb impression of the respondent is identified by her advocate. Learned counsel appearing for the parties state that the consent minutes of the order are explained to the parties in Marathi. Statement is accepted. Consent Minutes of the Order are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.

kvm 2/2 pro1-SA953.12 4.

Second Appeal No.953 of 2012 is disposed of in terms of the Consent Minutes of the Order. No order as to costs.

5.

In view of the disposal of the second appeal, Civil applications pending if any, are also disposed of.

[R.D. DHANUKA, J.]