Taramati Sadanand Pathak v. Velukatil Ulhanan Seemon And ANR

1-appw-363-16 pdp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1169 OF 2015 Taramati Sadanand Pathak .. Applicant Vs.

Velukatil Ulhanan Seemon and anr.

.. Respondents Taramati Sadanand Pathak, petitioner, party-in-person present. Mrs. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for State.

CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & A. M. BADAR, JJ.

MARCH 31, 2016.

P.C.

1.

We have heard applicant, party-in-person. Applicant submitted that the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 30/6/2015 in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1169 of 2015 is required to be set aside by this court. The applicant, party-in-person placed reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Appeal (Cri) No. 1253 of 2001 in the matter of Harjeet Singh @ Seeta vs. State of Punjab and anr. dated

1-appw-363-16 6/12/2001 and the order passed by this court (Coram: Ranjit More and V.L. Achilya, JJ.) dated 5/1/2016 in Criminal Application No. 879 of 2015 in Criminal Application No.604 of 2015.

2.

We do not have jurisdiction to set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge in the present proceedings. In the facts, no interference is warranted.

3.

Application is rejected accordingly.

(A. M. BADAR, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)