Mrs. Asmita Rajendra Bhalkar v. Mr. Rajendra Krishnat Bhalkar

2. FCA 262-14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 262 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FCA NO. 301 OF 2018 Mrs. Asmita Rajendra Bhalkar ...

Appellant

Versus

Mr. Rajendra Krishnat Bhalkar ...

Respondent Mr. Rajesh P. Khobragade, advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Abhijit Adagule for Respondent nos. 2 to 4. CORAM :

A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ DATED :

18TH JANUARY, 2022.

P.C.:

1.

Learned Counsel for the parties state that the matter is settled and have tendered Consent Terms signed by the parties and their Advocates.

2.

Appellant-wife is present on VC. Respondent-husband is also present alongwith his Advocate on VC.

Nikita Gadgil 1/2

2. FCA 262-14.doc 3.

Learned Counsel for the parties state that the Appellant-wife and Respondent are residing separately for more than nine years and there is no possibility of reconciliation.

4.

The Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. The marriage between the parties stands dissolved by mutual consent under Section 13 B of the Hindu Marriage Act. 5.

The Civil Application does not survive and to stand disposed of. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (A. A. SAYED, J.) Digitally signed by NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL Date:

2022.01.20 15:48:14 +0530 NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL Nikita Gadgil 2/2