Yusuf Salim Chaudhary v. Kundalika Kana Patil And ANR

wp.2883.16.23.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2883 OF 2016 Yusuf Salim Chaudhary

...Petitioner

Versus

Kundalika Kana Patil & Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Kanishk Jayant with Mr. Ganesh Kamble and Mr. Anand Dhongade for the Petitioner Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent No.2-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

FRIDAY, 30 th SEPTEMBER, 2016 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2.

By this petition, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 14th July, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-2, Raigad, Alibaug, by which the learned Judge was pleased to condone the delay of 546 days in preferring Criminal Revision Application. 3.

Perused the order dated 14th July, 2016. The learned Judge has observed that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondent No. 1 had shown sufficient cause for condoning the delay. SQ Pathan 1/2

wp.2883.16.23.doc 4.

No interference is warranted in the discretion exercised by the learned Sessions Judge. The learned Judge to hear the petitioner in the revision application. All contentions raised by the petitioner in the said revision application are kept open.

5.

Petition is disposed of accordingly.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2