← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/1922/2014trial be expedited

Rajshekhar Siddhapa Chinekar v. The State Of Maharastra

2015-02-25Hon'Ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav1 pages

Mhi 1 BA-1922-1923-14.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAILAPPLICATION NO. 1922 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1923 OF 2014 Rajshekhar Siddhapa Chinekar ...

Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondents Mr. Ashok Mundargi, Senior Counsel i/b. Mr. Shailesh Chavan, for the applicant Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the respondent-State.

CORAM:

SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J.

DATE : 25th February, 2015.

P.C.

The learned APP submits that in the present case, trial has commenced. The prosecution has examined the complainant. The learned Sessions Court has fixed the schedule for further recording of evidence. The learned Sessions Court shall not be influenced by the withdrawal of these applications and shall proceed with the trial as expeditiously as possible. Applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.

(SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)