Basab Biraj Paul v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR
13.rpw.57-21.doc PMB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.57 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2493 OF 2019 Basab Biraj Paul .. Petitioner
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
V.K. Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
.. Petitioners vs.
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
.. Respondents --------------------- Mr. Jamsheed Master I/b. Mr. Bharat Vaishnav for the Petitioner. Smt. V.S. Nimbalkar, AGP for the State.
Mr. Swapnil P. Kamble for Respondent No.2.
--------------------- CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 4, 2021 P.C.:- Learned counsel for the Review Petitioner in all fairness submits that he is not pressing the Review Petition. According to him, there was some communication gap between the then counsel representing the Petitioner as regards the statement made to deposit the amount of Rs.3,50,000/- before the Industrial Court, Mumbai. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner had not instructed the earlier counsel to deposit the said amount and the concession was wrongly made.
1/2
13.rpw.57-21.doc 2.
Be that as it may, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that though the Company has been struck of from the Registrar of Companies (ROC), the individual Director would be taking steps to deposit the said amount of Rs.3,50,000/-. Learned counsel for the Petitioner however prays that considering the misunderstanding and the communication gap, the time to deposit the amount of Rs.3,50,000/- be extended. 3.
In my opinion, in the interest of justice, the time to deposit the amount in terms of the order dated 27.03.2019 is extended by a further period of four weeks from today. Consequentially, the further compliance as mentioned in the order dated 27.03.2019 accordingly stands extended.
4.
Subject to this clarifcation, the Review Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) Digitally signed by PRADNYA MAKARAND BHOGALE Date:
2021.10.04 14:59:17 +0530 PRADNYA MAKARAND BHOGALE 2/2