Nitesh Jain S/O Mr Chandanmal Jain v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 16 ABA-2324-22+1.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2324 OF 2022 Chandanmal Jain ..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2325 OF 2022 Nitesh Jain s/o Chandanmal Jain ..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ...

Mr.Niranjan Mundargi with Mr.Anshul Rawat, Mr.Anshuman R. Asare and Mr.Ankur Pahade for the Applicants in both the Applications.

Ms.A.A.Takalkar, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Mr.Siddharth Murarka with Mr.Devendra Tiwari i/b Law Chamber of Siddharth Murarka for the Respondent No.2 in both the Applications.

API Abhinay Pawar, attached to Malad Police Station, present. ...

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 06th SEPTEMBER, 2022 M.M.Salgaonkar

2/2 16 ABA-2324-22+1.doc P.C:- 1.

The affdavit-in-reply fled by the complainantrespondent No.2 is taken on record. 2.

Admittedly, the applicants are issued with the notice under Section 41A of Cr.P.C. on 09/08/2022. It is expected that they shall report to the Investigating Offcer within 7 days from today.

3.

Upon their appearance, the Investigating Offcer shall interrogate them in the wake of the accusations faced by them and in case, he is desirous of effecting their arrest, he shall record his reasons in writing. Further, on being satisfed that the custodial interrogation is necessary, he shall serve 72 hours notice on the applicants.

4.

The applications stand disposed off.

( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.) M.M.Salgaonkar