Bombay High CourtCAO/283/2015

Classic Wordrob v. Raju Dhondu Jadhav

2016-10-26Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.K. Tahilramani2 pages

jdk 1 1.cao.283.15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 283 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO. 23485 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6931 OF 2010 M/s. Classic Wardrobe .. Applicant Vs.

Mr. Raju Dhondu Jadhav .. Respondent ....

Mr. Shailesh S. Pathak Advocate along with Mr. T.R. Yadav Advocate for Applicant None for Respondent.

....

CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.

DATED : OCTOBER 26, 2016 IN CHAMBER AT 2.40 P.M.

P.C.:

This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the Review Petition.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant. None appears for the respondent. Affidavit of service is filed with acknowledgement showing that notice has been served on the respondent.

jdk 2 1.cao.283.15.doc Looking to the averments in the application and in the interest of justice, I am of the opinion that delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, delay is condoned. Application is allowed in above terms.

Office to number the Review Petition.

[ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] kandarkar