Javed Sikandar Mulla v. The State Of Maharashtra

10 WP 3147 OF 2013.doc vks

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3147 OF 2013 Javed Sikandar Mulla ....

Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ....

Respondent The petitioner through jail.

Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, ACTING C.J. & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.

DATE : 9TH FEBRUARY 2016.

ORAL ORDER: [Per: Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, Acting CJ] 1.

The petitioner has preferred this petition through jail, hence we appoint Ms. Rohini Dandekar, who is on the panel of High Court Legal Services Committee, to represent the petitioner in this petition. 2.

Heard both sides.

3.

Rule.

4.

Rule is made returnable forthwith.

5.

The petitioner had preferred an application for parole which

10 WP 3147 OF 2013.doc came to be rejected. The appeal preferred by him against order of rejection was also dismissed. Hence this petition.

6.

The case of the petitioner is that his mother's father expired on 18th February, 2012 and he wants to go to attend some religious rituals in relation to his grand father's death.

7.

Looking to the fact that we are in the year 2016, we are not inclined to entertain this petition.

8.

In view of above, rule is discharged.

9.

Fees be paid to the appointed advocate as per rules. [ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.] [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]