Laxmikant Dattatray Rokhade And ANR v. Neelam Laxmikant Rokhade And ANR

TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Tauseef Farooqui 39-APPLN.301.2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Date: 2022.12.20 19:20:09 +0530 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.301 OF 2022 Laxmikant Dattatray Rokhade & Anr.

...Applicants V/s.

Neelam Laxmikant Rokhade & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Ashutosh L. Hasija i/by Mr. Sachin S. Punde for Applicants. Mr. Vishal M. Dhamal for Respondent No.1.

Mr. A. R. Patil, APP for Respondent No.8 (State).

CORAM

:

AMIT BORKAR, J.

DATE :

DECEMBER 19, 2022 P.C.:

1.

The husband has filed present Application under Section 407 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to transfer Criminal Case No.146 of 2017 from the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Kalyan to the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pune. The Application enumerates details of proceedings filed by the parties against each other. 2.

Criminal Case No.146 of 2017 and Criminal (Delay Condonation) M. A. No.71 of 2019 are pending at Kalyan and remaining matters are pending at Family Court, Pune. 3.

Learned advocate for the respondent no.1-wife, on instructions, states that the respondent no.1 is residing in Pune. Since both the parties are residing in Pune, the applicant has made out the case for transfer of proceedings from Court at Kalyan to

Tauseef Farooqui 39-APPLN.301.2022.doc Court at Pune.

4.

The Application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)