Farooque Abdul Sattar Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

3.cri.appln.240.14.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 240 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL REVISIN APPLICATION STAMP NO. 298 OF 2014 Mr.Farooque Abdul Sattar Shaikh ...

Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and another ...

Respondents Mr.J.M.Puranik, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr.A.R.Patil, APP for Respondent No.1 - State. Mr.M.A.Solkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM :

R. G. KETKAR, J.

DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2015 P.C. :

.

Heard Mr.J.M.Puranik, learned Counsel for the applicant, Mr.A.R.Patil, learned APP for Respondent No.1 - State and Mr.M.A.Solkar, learned Counsel for respondent No.2. 2.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 26 days in filing the revision application. For the reasons stated in paragraphs 4 & 5 of the application as also having further due regard to the fact that the applicant has deposited amount of Rs.88,000/- being arrears of maintenance under the impugned order, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out a sufficient cause for condoning the delay.

1/2

3.cri.appln.240.14.sxw 3.

Hence, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Office is directed to register the Revision Application, if it is otherwise ready.

(R. G. KETKAR, J.) ingale 2/2