Shashikala Wd/O. Kedarnath More v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date:

2023.07.07 15:17:35 +0530 HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV 24.aba972.21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.972 OF 2021 Bhanumati Raju Solanki ...Applicant vs.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH INTERVENTION APPLICATION NO.320 OF 2022 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.972 OF 2021 Shashikala Kedarnath More & Ors.

...Intervenors In the matter between Bhanumati Raju Solanki ...Applicant vs.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Abdul Rab Shaikh for the Applicant in ABA No.972/2021 Mr. Y. M. Nakhawa APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM :S. M. MODAK, J.

DATED :1ST JULY 2023 P. C. :

1.

Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent-State.

2.

The offence is registered with Khadakpada police station, Kalyan under sections 420, 406 read with 34 of IPC. Shiv 1/2

24.aba972.21.doc 3.

This Court has protected the Applicant-accused from arrest as per the order dated 6th April 2021.

4.

During the pendency of this Application, the police have filed the charge-sheet. A report to that effect dated 30th June 2023, is submitted today. It is taken on record and marked as Annexure "X" for identification. In view of that custodial interrogation is not required. The interim order dated 6th April 2021, is confirmed. 5.

Application is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, Intervention Application No.320 of 2022 is also disposed of. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Shiv 2/2