Abu S/O. Mohd Khan v. Khan Nisar Ahmed And ANR

11.APPLN.507.16 a.w. 508.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.507 OF 2016 Mr. ABU S/o. Mohd Khan ...Applicant V/s.

Khan Nisar Ahmed & Anr.

...Respondents

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.508 OF 2016 Mr. Hasrat S/o. Ahmed Shaikh ...Applicant V/s.

Mr. Khan Nisar Ahmed S/o. Ilakedar Khan & Anr.

...Respondents

.....

Mr. Mateen Shaikh a/w.Sajid Qureshi a/w.Ms.Adeeba Khan, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for respondent No.2/State. ....

CORAM : A.M.BADAR, J.

DATED : 12th OCTOBER 2018.

P.C. :

1.

These are applications for condonation of delay of 51 days in preferring an application for leave to appeal in order to challenge the Judgment and Order of acquittal of respondent Aarti Palkar 1/2

11.APPLN.507.16 a.w. 508.16.doc No.1/accused of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

2.

None appears for respondent No.1/original accused despite service. The learned APP appears for respondent No.2/State. 3.

Heard.

4.

For the reasons stated in the applications, which are on affidavit, the delay in filing the applications for leave to appeal deserves to be condoned as sufficient cause is shown. Therefore, the order.

- : ORDER : - (i) Both the applications are allowed.

(ii) The delay in filing the applications for leave to appeal is condoned.

(iii) The instant applications are accordingly disposed off. (A.M.BADAR J.) Aarti Palkar 2/2