Sandeepak Sadanand Phodke v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Ajay 1/2 936.APL.1104.19 (i)+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1104 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1623 OF 2019 Sandeepak Sadanand Phadke .....Intervener.

In the matter of between Smt. Dipti Saroj Kale .....Applicant.

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent.

.....

Mr. Rajiv Chavan Sr. Counsel a/w. Mr. Rajesh More, Ms. Priyanka Chavan, Sumangala Yadav, Amey Chandorkar i/b. Mr. Nitin Gangal, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. Manoj Mohite a/w. Tapan Thatte, Advocate for intervenor. Mr. P.P. Shinde, APP for Respondent - State.

.....

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J.

DATE : 2nd August, 2019.

PC.

1.

Liberty to file copy of the charge-sheet along with its accompaniments in the registry without prejudice to the contentions of the respondents.

2.

Heard learned Senior Counsel for the applicant. For the reasons stated in Criminal Application No. 1104 of 2019, and since the applicant who is first informant was heard before the Trial Court, application is allowed and same

Ajay 2/2 936.APL.1104.19 (i)+ stands disposed of.

3.

The applicant who is an informant to be impleaded as partly respondent in the Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1623 of 2019. Amendment to be carried out within one week from today. Amended copy of application to be served on other side on or before next date. 4.

On amendment being carried out, issue notice to newly added respondent, returnable on 19th August 2019. The learned counsel appearing for intervenor waives notice for added Respondent. 5.

Criminal Application No. 1104 of 2019 is accordingly disposed of. [S.S. SHINDE, J.]