Bombay High CourtWP/181/2009disposed off

Uttam Kashinath Aher v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

2021-04-01Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1756 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1607 OF 2009 Chhaya d/o. Dagadu Sarode @ Rambha w/o. Eknathrao Salve ...

Petitioner/Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4248 OF 2009 Vaishali Ramesh Pakhare ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4947 OF 2009 Anil Ramdas Khadtare ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4960 OF 2009 Dattatraya Shankar Masurkar ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.181 OF 2009 Uttam Kashinath Aher ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents 1/3

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.207 OF 2009 Vijay Karbhari Jadhav ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1757 OF 2009 Kiran s/o. Narhari Wattamwar ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents .....

Mr.Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy), Advocate for the Petitioner in WP/1756/2009.

Adv.Leena Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP/181/2009 and WP/207/2001.

Mr.A.P.Vanarase, AGP for the Respondent/State. Mr.Sachindra B. Shetye, Advocate for the Respondent No.3 in WP/4248/2009.

.....

CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.

DATE :- APRIL 1, 2021 PC :

These Petitions have been notified as per the list of matters as received from the office of the learned Government Pleader to have become infructuous. As per the office notice dated 16th March 2021, the Advocates for the petitioners were called upon to give a praecipe in advance in case the petitions have not become infructuous. Such 2/3

praecipe has not been received in regard to these petitions. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of as infructuous; however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive the petitions in case something survives.

Disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed of. (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) 3/3