Tahir Israil Ansari v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 32-ba.1929.2017.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1929 OF 2017 Tahir Israil Ansari ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr.Vijay Killedar, for the Applicant.

Ms.P.N.Dabholkar, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. Applicant's father is present in Court.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 9th APRIL, 2018 P.C. :

1.

Learned Counsel for the applicant has tendered the FSL Report. The same is taken on record and a copy thereof is served on the learned APP.

2.

Without going into the merits of the case, since the Court is inclined to expedite the case of the applicant, learned counsel for the applicant, on the instructions of the applicant's father, who is present in Court, does not press this application and seeks leave to withdraw the

2/2 32-ba.1929.2017.doc same with liberty to file a fresh application, in case the trial does not conclude, within a specified time.

3.

Accordingly, the trial of the applicant is expedited. The learned Judge to conclude the trial, as expeditiously as possible and in any event within 4 months from the date of receipt of this order. If, for no fault of the applicant, the trial does not conclude within the aforesaid period, the Applicant is at liberty to file a fresh application seeking his enlargement on bail, which will be considered on its own merits. 4.

It is made clear, that this application has not been heard on merits.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)