Nirmal Sharad Mutha v. The State Of Maharashtra

906. ABA-1686-2019.doc BDP-SPS-TAC BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1686 OF 2019 BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2021.08.11 16:56:35 +0530 Mr. Nirmal Sharad Mutha ....Applicant.

V/s The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent WITH APPP/1153/2019 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1686 OF 2019 Sopan Gahinaji Lanke ....Intervener (Original Complainant) In the matter between Nirmal Sharad Mutha ...Applicant.

V/s The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent.

------ Mr. Anil for the Applicant Ms. Sharmila S. Kaushik, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. Vijaykumar B. Dighe for Intervener.

------ CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE: AUGUST 10, 2021 P.C.:- 1] Counsel for the Applicant and complainant are in agreement that monetary claim inter se between the parties is settled and as such, they need to move for quashing by consent.

1/2

906. ABA-1686-2019.doc 2] In the aforesaid backdrop, on motion made by learned Counsel for the Applicant, application stands disposed of as withdrawn. However, interim protection shall continue to operate for a period of eight weeks. Consequently, all pending applications are also disposed of.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 2/2