Mr. Vinod Vithal Ruke v. Mr. Vithal Bhaguram Ruke

23 cao 195-14=.doc FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 195 OF 2014 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 23888 OF 2014 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 131 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. K. N. kore for the applicant.

None for the respondents.

CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATED : 27/01/2015.

P.C.:

.

Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant.

Though, the respondents are duly served, no one appeared on behalf of them when the matter called out.

This application is preferred by defendant for condonation of 19 days delay in filing Review Petition.

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and averments made in civil application, I am satisfied that applicant has made out the case for allowing the civil application. Hence, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads thus: Sneha Chavan 1/2

23 cao 195-14=.doc "a) The delay of about 19 days may please be condoned and the review petition may please be heard on it's own merits."

Civil application is disposed of accordingly. Office is directed to place the review petition on board on 09.02.2015.

(K.K.TATED, J.) Sneha Chavan 2/2