M/S. Satish D. Darekar Through Its Proprietor Satish Dagadu Darekar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary, Urban Development Dept. And ANR.

16_wpst_23960_2014.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (st) NO.23960 OF 2014 Satish D. Darekar

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

...

Mr. G.S. Godbole i/b. Ms Sumit Kothari for the Petitioner. Mr. N.V. Walawalkar, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. G.H. Keluskar for Respondent No.2.

Mr. P.G. Kathane, AGP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

DATED : 5th OCTOBER, 2016 P. C. :

Mr. Godbole, the learned counsel for the Petitioner, at the outset makes a statement that he has demolished the bungalow known as "Taramati", which is the subject matter of an appeal under section 47 of the M.R.T.P. Act before the State Government, without prejudice to his rights and contentions. The relief claimed in the petition therefore, will not survive. 2.

The writ petition(st) No.23960 of 2014 is accordingly disposed of as rendered infructuous. The State Government shall decide the said appeal in accordance with law.

(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.) Megha 1/1