Suresh Kumar Agarwal v. Mahendra P. Suwal And ANR

by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date:

2024.03.02 19:59:41 +0530 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 970 OF 2018 Suresh Kumar Agarwal ...Appellant Vs.

Mahendra P. Suwal and Anr.

...Respondents

*** Mr.Vivek B. Rane (Appointed through Legal Aid) - Advocate for Appellant.

Mr.Prasad L. Gajbhiye - Advocate for Respondent No.1. ***

CORAM

: S. M. MODAK J.

[HEAD OF THE PANEL] V. V. KATHARE REGISTRAR (VIGILANCE-II) MEMBER S. N. PHAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR MEMBER DATED : 03rd MARCH, 2024 P.C. :- 1.

The Appellant preferred present Appeal against the acquittal u/s 138 of NI Act. The Appellant and Respondents and their learned Satish Sangar 1/7

Counsels are present before the Lok - Adalat. The Appellant and Respondents have filed 'consent terms' settling their dispute relating to dishonour of cheque. The 'consent terms' are signed by them and their learned Counsels. It is marked Article - A. For ready reference, the consent terms are scanned and reproduced herein below :- Satish Sangar 2/7

Satish Sangar 3/7

Satish Sangar 4/7

Satish Sangar 5/7

2.

Now, the Appellant wants to withdraw the Appeal in the light of 'consent terms'. Therefore, the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in the light of 'consent terms'.

3.

The Appellant's Advocate on record is not present before the Lok - Satish Sangar 6/7

Adalat and the Appellant is identified by an Advocate on Legal Aid Panel - Mr.Vivek Rane.

4.

The 'consent terms' shall form part of the Award. The signatories of the 'consent terms' acknowledge the contents of 'consent terms'. 5.

Court fees be refunded as per the Rules.

[S. N. PHAD] [V. V. KATHARE] [ S. M. MODAK J.] HEAD OF THE PANEL MEMBER MEMBER Satish Sangar 7/7