Javed Rafiq Ansari v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

12 wp 3028 of 2016.doc vks

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3028 OF 2016 Javed Rafique Ansari .... Petitioner.

V/s.

State of Maharashtra and anr .... Respondents Mr. K. J. Patil, a/w Mr. Janu Gulati, for the Petitioner.

Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent State. Mr. Sachin Pandkar, Sub Ddivisional Officer, Dahanu Division. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 14th FEBRUARY, 2017.

P.C. :

1.

Having heard Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner, for some time, Mr. Yagnik, learned APP, having taken instructions from Mr. Sachin Pandkar, Sub Divisional Police Officer, Dahanu Division, makes a statement that in the light of statement of Manish Vanjara recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Investigating Officer will ask for permission from Additional Sessions Judge, MCOC Court, in MCOC Case No.1 of 2016 for further investigation under Section 173 (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Statement accepted. 2.

In view of above, Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner 1/2

12 wp 3028 of 2016.doc fairly stated that the grievance of the petitioner at this stage, is redressed and, therefore, he seeks leave to withdraw this petition. 3.

Leave granted.

4.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR JOSHI, J.] [RANJIT MORE,J.] 2/2