Sunil Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date:

2024.01.16 17:37:46 +0530 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR 14-APPR-423-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION IN REVISION NO. 423 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION(ST)NO. 469 OF 2017 Sunil Shinde ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

***** Ms.Samrudhi Gholap i/b. Lawkhart Legal - Advocate for Applicant.

Mr.A.D.Kamkhedkar - APP for Respondent No.1 - State. ***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

11th JANUARY 2024 P. C. :- 1.

Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant.

2.

It is true that the Court of Additional Sessions Judge has declined to discharge this Applicant and that is why, this Revision. There is a delay in filing Revision. 3.

However, during pendency of this proceeding, trial proceeded and now, it is fixed for pronouncement of the judgment.

4.

In view of that, Application and Revision have become infructous. Hence, disposed of.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 1/1