Rushikesh Madan Sapkal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES JOHNSON GONSALVES Date: 2022.02.24 13:50:05 +0530 sg 23.wp9385-21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9385 OF 2021 Rushikesh Madan Sapkal ..

Petitioner v/s.

The State of Maharashtra And Ors.

..

Respondents ....

Mr. Sanjay P. Shinde, for the Petitioner.

Mrs. P.J. Gavhane, AGP, for State.

Mr. Mahadeo P. Ghadge, for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. ....

CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE & AMIT BORKAR JJ.

DATE : 22 FEBRUARY 2022 P.C:- Heard Mr. Shinde, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mrs. Gavhane, AGP, for State and Mr. Ghadge, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

2.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of parties.

3.

Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the proposal dated

sg 23.wp9385-21.doc 27 October 2016 seeking approval to the appointment of the Petitioner as Peon in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 4.

Rule made absolute in the above terms and the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. (AMIT BORKAR J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.)