Konkan Railway Corporation Limited v. Prashant D. Surve

94.ia.16948.2022.doc Chaitali Ekke

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 16948 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8012 OF 2007 Konkan Railway Corporation Limited ...Applicant In the matter between Konkan Railway Corporation Limited

...Petitioner

Versus

Prashant D. Surve

...Respondent

....

Mr. N.N. Gawade, Advocate i/b M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & Co., Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. Aniket Mokashi holding for Advocate Mr. P. M. Mokashi, Advocate for Respondent.

....

CORAM

: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATED : 20th March 2023 P.C.:

This Interim Application is filed to bring on record the proposed legal heirs of Sole Respondent. So also, prayer clause (e), i.e., recall the order dated 14.07.2008, passed in Civil Application No. 576 of 2008.

Advocate Mr. Aniket Mokashi holding for Advocate Mr. P.M. Mokashi states that they have instructions to appear for proposed legal heirs. Hence, prayer clause (a) and (b) of this application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. This order is corrected pursuant to Suo Moto speaking to the minutes order dated 24th March 2023

94.ia.16948.2022.doc As far as other prayer clauses in this Interim Application are concerned, Advocate for Respondent is granted three weeks time for filing Vakalatnama.

Matter to come up on board after a period of four weeks. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) This order is corrected pursuant to Suo Moto speaking to the minutes order dated 24th March 2023