← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPA/1297/2019others disposed off

Raju Makhadamu Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

2019-08-07Hon'Ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav3 pages

1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1297 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1054 OF 2019 Raju Makhadamu Shaikh ....

Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ....

Respondent Mr. Murtaza Najmi i/by Mr. Avinash S. Ovhal for the Applicant. Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for State Coram : Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, J.

Date : 7th August 2019 P.C.:

1.

Heard the respective counsel.

2.

This is an application under Section 389 Code of Criminal Procedure seeking suspension of substantive sentence. The applicant herein is convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag, in Sessions Case No.28 of 2012, for the ofence punishable under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to sufer rigorous imprisonment for one year and

2/3 a fne of Rs.1,000/-, in default to sufer simple imprisonment for one month vide judgment and order dated 12th July 2019. 3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was on bail during pendency of the trial and has not committed breach of any conditions imposed upon him. In any case, it is a short term sentence and the same is suspended by the learned Sessions Judge to enable the applicant to fle an appeal. In view of this, the applicant deserves the bail during pendency of the appeal. Hence, the following order.

O R D E R

i ) The application is allowed and stands disposed of. ii ) The substantive sentence imposed upon the applicant vide judgment and order dated 12th July 2019 is hereby suspended.

iii ) The applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the like amount.

iv ) The applicant shall mark his presence before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag once in six months on the date assigned by the Sessions Judge. v ) Upon failure to attend any two consecutive dates, the Sessions Court shall report the same to the High Court and the

3/3 prosecution would be at liberty to fle an application seeking cancellation of bail.

( Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, J)