Suraj Rajabhau Chetti And ORS v. Krishna Foundation Jayshreemaladevi Naik-Nimbalkar Institute Of Management Studies, Phaltan And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8769 OF 2012 Suraj Rajabhau Chetti And Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
Krishna Foundation Jayshreemaladevi Naik-Nimbalkar Institute Of Management Studies, Phaltan And Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8748 OF 2010 Tahesin Hamid Momin And Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
Satara College Of Engineering And Management And Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8768 OF 2010 Nilesh Panditrao Futane And Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
Krishna Institute Of Computer Application And Management And Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8752 OF 2010 Abhijeet Narayan Shinde And Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
Satara College Of Engineering And Management And Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8767 OF 2010 Nita Sambbhaji Kshirsagar And Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
Jaywant Institute Of Management And Ors.
...Respondents
----- None for the Petitioners.
Smt. V. M. Mali, AGP a/w Mr. P. P. Kakde, G. P. for the Respondent/State. ----- Kiran Kawre 1/3
C0RAM : G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2024 PC 1.
Learned Government Pleader, Appellate Side had circulated with the Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed and disposed of as infructuous. These petitions are also in the list. This list of infructuous matters was notified by the office by its notice dated 25 January 2024, by which the parties/advocates were intimated that if the proceedings have not become infructuous, then a praecipe be submitted in the office before its listing stating that the matter needs to be adjudicated. Accordingly, after such prior notice, these matters are listed today before this Court. No praecipe has been received on behalf of the petitioners or the advocate for the petitioners stating that something would survive for adjudication in these petitions.
Even when these petitions were called out, none appears for the petitioners. It, therefore, appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute these petitions and/or they have become infructuous. These petitions are, accordingly, disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive these petitions, in the event, the petitioners feels that the cause of action still survive.
Kiran Kawre 2/3
4.
Disposed of in the above terms. No costs.
5.
Civil Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Kiran Kawre 3/3