Babasaheb Pandit Patil And ORS. v. The Regional Dy. Director (Sugar) And Joint Registrar And ORS.

1 9-wp-7231-2006 with wp-7493-2006 with cas.sxw dgm

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETTION NO. 7231 OF 2006 Babasaheb Pandit Patil and ors.

.... Petitioner s vs The Regional Deputy Director (Sugar) and Joint Registrar and ors.

.... Respondents ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 2710/2006, 2711/2006, and 2857/2006 AND ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7493 OF 2006 Kolhapur District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd.

... Petitioner vs.

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

.... Respondents Mr. Dushyant Pagare i/by Mr. R.S. Datar for the Petitioner in WP/7231/2006.

Mr. V.S. Tadke i/by Mr. M. L. Patil for the Petitioner in WP/7493/2006. Mr. G.N. Salunke for applicant in WP/2857/2006. Mr. V.B. Rajure for Respondent No.5 in WP/7231/2006. Mr. Pradip K. Patole i/by Mr. S.S. Patwardhan for Respondents 6 and 7 in WP/7231/2006.

Ms. Neha Bhide-Palshikar, "B" Panel counsel for State in both matters. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.

DATE : February 09, 2015

2 9-wp-7231-2006 with wp-7493-2006 with cas.sxw P.C.:

The learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.5, on instructions, makes statement that the matter is pertaining to and revolving around the election of Respondent No.4 (Datta Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited) where the liquidator was already appointed. The statement is made that the said society is already transferred to Dalmiya Bharat Sugar Karkhana Limited long back. Therefore, in view of this, the issue and the challenge so raised becomes infructuous.

This Court, by reasoned order dated 22.12.2006, has made some observations and I am maintaining the said observations so made in the said order. In view of subsequent development so recorded above of transfer, I see no reason to keep this matter pending. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to apply for appropriate order in case they get instructions otherwise for modification and/or even for revocation of the order so passed today. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. In view of disposal of writ petition no.7231/2006, Civil

3 9-wp-7231-2006 with wp-7493-2006 with cas.sxw Application Nos. 2710/2006, 2711/2006, and 2857/2006, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly.

In view of above, writ petition no.7493/2006 is also disposed of accordingly as the same also arises out of the common order in question.

(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)