← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/11559/2017disposed off

New Badamwadi Rahiwasi Seva Sangh v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India And ORS

2019-04-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.S. Sanklecha2 pages

wp-11559-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11559 OF 2017 New Badamwadi Rahiwasi Sevak Sangh ..

Petitioner.

v/s.

Life Insurance Corporation & Others ..

Respondents.

Mr. Shivprasad R. Page, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Harihar Bhave with Ms. Rupa Bhave and Ms. Divya Menon i/b. Bhave & Co., for the Respondents Nos. 1 to 4.

Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP, for the Respondent No.5. Mr. P. K. Sonawane, for the Respondent No.6-UOI CORAM: A.S.OKA & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.

DATE : 1st APRIL, 2019.

P.C:- Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel for the 1st to 4th Respondents. By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners are virtually seeking a declaration that they are the tenants of the premises allegedly held by them in their capacity as heirs and legal representatives of the original tenants. There is a consequential direction sought to transfer the tenancy rights in their names and to issue rent receipts in their names.

This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India S.R.JOSHI

involves the disputed questions of fact. Therefore, the more appropriate remedy for the Petitioner is to seek a declaration from the competent authority.

Another grievance made by the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner is based on certain statements made in the affidavit in reply of 1st to 4 Respondents that the 1st Respondent is not following the binding decision of the Apex Court in the case of Dr. Suhas Phophale v/s. Oriental Insurance Company. The learned Counsel appearing for the 1st to 4th Respondents states that the 1st Respondent has stated in the affidavit in reply that the issue has been referred to the larger bench. So long as the decision in the case of Dr. Suhas Phophale (supra) continues to hold the field, the 1st Respondent is bound by the same.

Subject to what is observed above, we decline to entertain this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petition is disposed of. Remedies of the Petitioner are kept open. The rights and contentions of the parties are also kept open. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (A.S.OKA,J.) S.R.JOSHI