Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Umesha Raghunath Kale

108-wp-9417-2019.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9417 OF 2019 Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

...Petitioner

vs.

Umesh Raghunath Kale

...Respondent

VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2023.04.19 14:41:37 +0530 Mr. Varun Joshi a/w. Chetan Alai and Ms. Rama Somani, for the Petitioner.

Ms. Jone Cox i/b. Ms. Jignasha Panday, for the Respondent. Mr. Umesh R. Kale, the respondent present.

CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

APRIL 18, 2023 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned counsel submit that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and executed the consent terms. 3.

The learned counsel seek leave to tender the consent terms. 4.

Leave granted.

5.

Mr. Umesh Kale, the respondent and Mr. Franklin Sumitra, the Chief Manager, Industrial Relations of the petitioner are present before the Court. They admit the contents of the consent terms and execution thereof.

6.

The respondent, upon being inquired, submits that he is agreeable to the terms of resolution recorded in the consent terms and has executed the consent terms voluntarily. Vishal Parekar ...1

108-wp-9417-2019.doc 7.

It appears that the parties have arrived at a comprehensive settlement of the dispute and there is no coercion or duress. 8.

The consent terms are thus taken on record and marked X. 9.

The undertakings in the consent terms are accepted as the undertakings to the Court.

10.

The petition stands disposed in accordance with the consent terms (X).

11.

There shall be no order as to costs.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Vishal Parekar ...2