Ashrukant Dadarao Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra

8.ba1810.16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1810 OF 2016 Ashrukant Dadarao Kamble.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Sandip J. Ghogare, advocate for Applicant. Mr. Prashant Jadhav, APP for State.

--- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : DECEMBER 5, 2016 P.C.:

The learned APP at the outset submits that in the present case, charge has been framed and trial has commenced. It is in this circumstance, that the application deserves to be disposed of by requesting the learned Sessions Judge seized with Session Case No. 9 of 2016 to make every endeavour to conclude the recording of evidence as far as possible within 9 months from today. It is a case of circumstantial evidence and prima facie, it appears that the investigating agency has recorded the statement of as many as 33 Talwalkar 1/2

8.ba1810.16.sxw witnesses. It being a case of circumstantial evidence, the trial can be expedited.

The application stands disposed of on the above terms. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J) Talwalkar 2/2